3.8 Article

Andrej Sladkovi? a Memorandum naroda slovenskeho Daniela Kodajova

期刊

SLOVENSKA LITERATURA
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 86-94

出版社

SLOVAK ACAD SCIENCES, INST SLOVAK LITERATURE
DOI: 10.31577/slovlit.2023.70.1.7

关键词

Andrej Sl?dkovi?; Memorandum of the Slovak Nation; Slovak Romanticism; nationalism; historical document; literary representations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Andrej Sladkovic (1820-1872) was a priest and poet who also wrote reports from cultural and political events and provided feedback to others' works. He played a significant role in the publication of the minutes and diary from the Slovak national assembly in 1861. His goals were to provide information, preserve the memory of the events, and reflect on the activities of the Slovak intelligentsia. The article discusses Sladkovic's contribution to the preparation of the materials for publication and capturing the atmosphere of the document's writing process.
Andrej Sladkovic (1820 - 1872) was not only a priest and a poet: he also wrote reports from cultural and political events and provided feedback to the works of others. Among other things, he considerably contributed to the publication of the minutes and diary from the Slovak national assembly held in Martin on 6th and 7th June 1861 where the Memorandum of the Slovak nation was adopted. A. Sladkovic assembled all the materials from the event and prepared them for publication. His goals in this regard were to provide information, preserve the memory of the events, and reflect on the activities of the Slovak nationally-oriented intelligentsia. In this way, he captured the personalities connected to the national movement and events forming national aware-ness. The article describes the circumstances under which A. Sladkovic participated on the documenting of the memorandum assembly and shows that he contributed not only to the preparation of the materials for publication, but also to the capturing of the atmosphere under which the document was written.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据