4.5 Article

Effect of cosolvents (ethyl lactate, ethyl acetate and ethanol) on the supercritical CO2 extraction of caffeine from green tea

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 507-512

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.07.008

关键词

Green tea; Caffeine; Cosolvent; Ethyl lactate; Supercritical fluid extraction

资金

  1. ALIBIRD (Comunidad de Madrid) project [S2013/ABI-2728]
  2. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Ciendficas (CSIC) of Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports experimental data to analyze the effect of different green cosolvents, namely ethyl lactate, ethyl acetate and ethanol, on the supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) extraction of caffeine from green tea leaves. The experiments were carried out in a pilot-scale plant using two different approaches: a static procedure in which the cosolvent was introduced in the extraction cell soaking the vegetal material and then SCCO2 was pumped, and a dynamic assay in which the cosolvent was pumped and mixed with SCCO2 before introduction into the extraction cell. The overall caffeine recovery from plant matrix was determined for all experiments at the same extraction conditions (30 MPa and 343 K). Additionally, the overall extraction curves of the static experiments were determined at the same process conditions, and the mass transfer model of Sovova was utilized to adjust the kinetic data and to determine the mass transfer coefficients. The highest caffeine yield was obtained with ethyl lactate in both static and dynamic extractions (13.0 and 14.2 mg/g of tea, respectively), followed by ethanol (10.8 mg/g with the static method and 8.8 mg/g with the dynamic method). The yield obtained with ethyl acetate in both extraction approaches was lower than 7 mg/g. These data reinforce previous results obtained by the authors regarding the competence of ethyl lactate in the extraction of caffeine from natural materials. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据