3.8 Article

Electronic nose-type chemosensory systems for detection of gaseous poisonous substances

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES UKRAINE, INST SEMICONDUCTOR PHYSICS
DOI: 10.15407/spqeo25.04.429

关键词

quartz crystal microbalance; chemoresistive electrodes; calixarenes; electrically conducting polymers; nanocomposites; organophosphorous and organochlorine compounds

资金

  1. NAS of Ukraine [0117U003279]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work is dedicated to studying the detection sensitivity and selectivity of various simulants of gaseous poisonous substances using different types of sensors. The results show that both the quartz crystal microbalance and chemoresistive electrodes can detect volatile compounds within a concentration range of 10 to 1000 ppm. The response time for the sensors varies from 10 to 20 seconds for the quartz crystal microbalance and up to 1 minute for the chemoresistive electrodes. Additionally, the qualitative identification of poisonous substances in a wide concentration range is possible through statistical analysis of the sensor array data.
The work is devoted to a study of the detection sensitivity and selectivity of a series of simulants of gaseous poisonous substances (PS). Two different sensor types were used, namely: 1) a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), exhibiting a shift of the resonant frequency of quartz plates coated with calixarene thin layers, and 2) chemoresistive electrodes coated with layers of nanocomposites of intrinsically conducting polymers (ICP) changing their conductance under the influence of adsorbed gas molecules. The concentration of the analyzed volatile compounds varied within the range of 10 to 1000 ppm. The detection threshold ranged from 10 to 100 ppm depending on the analyzed substance for both transducer types. The response time was from 10 to 20 s for the QCM sensors and up to 1 minute for the ICP based sensors. The possibility of qualitative identification of poisonous substances in a wide concentration range by means of statistical analysis of the sensor array data is demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据