4.5 Article

Fabric analysis of quartzites with negative magnetic susceptibility - Does AMS provide information of SPO or CPO of quartz?

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 48-59

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2015.11.005

关键词

Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility; Shape preferred orientation; Crystallographic preferred orientation; Quartzite

资金

  1. Institute Research Fellowship of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We ask the question whether petrofabric data from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) analysis of deformed quartzites gives information about shape preferred orientation (SPO) or crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) of quartz. Since quartz is diamagnetic and has a negative magnetic susceptibility, 11 samples of nearly pure quartzites with a negative magnetic susceptibility were chosen for this study. After performing AMS analysis, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis was done in thin sections prepared parallel to the K1K3 plane of the AMS ellipsoid. Results show that in all the samples quartz SPO is sub-parallel to the orientation of the magnetic foliation. However, in most samples no clear correspondance is observed between quartz CPO and K-1 (magnetic lineation) direction. This is contrary to the parallelism observed between K-1 direction and orientation of quartz c-axis in the case of undeformed single quartz crystal. Pole figures of quartz indicate that quartz c-axis tends to be parallel to K-1 direction only in the case where intracrystalline deformation of quartz is accommodated by prism < c > slip. It is therefore established that AMS investigation of quartz from deformed rocks gives information of SPO. Thus, it is concluded that petrofabric information of quartzite obtained from AMS is a manifestation of its shape anisotropy and not crystallographic preferred orientation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据