3.8 Article

Treating trauma-driven OCD with narrative exposure therapy alongside cognitive behavioural therapy

期刊

COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1754470X22000605

关键词

case study; ERP; narrative exposure therapy; OCD; PTSD; trauma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case study describes the application of concurrent cognitive behaviour therapy and narrative exposure therapy to treat a patient with co-occurring PTSD and OCD. The study found that using these two therapies concurrently can be effective when PTSD symptoms interfere with OCD treatment.
When post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) co-occurs with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), symptoms of the former can interfere with evidence-based treatment of the latter. As a result, exposure-based treatments are recommended for both OCD and PTSD, potentially facilitating a concurrent treatment approach. This case study describes the application of concurrent cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT including exposure and response prevention; ERP) for OCD and narrative exposure therapy to treat a patient whose PTSD symptoms of intrusive images of memories and hyperarousal were interfering with standard CBT (including ERP) treatment for OCD. Following this concurrent approach, the patient's symptoms of OCD reduced to non-clinical levels and showed reliable improvement in PTSD symptoms. Whilst further methodologically robust research is required, this case study highlights that this approach may be beneficial to the treatment of OCD where PTSD symptoms are impacting on treatment. Key learning aims To explore the literature considering explanations of the co-occurrence of OCD and PTSD symptomology. To consider how symptoms of two mental health conditions can maintain one another and attenuate the effectiveness of evidence-based treatment for the other mental health condition. Consider the use of concurrent therapeutic approaches to treat co-occurring mental health conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据