3.8 Article

Relationship between residents' sporting life and hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in Hiroshima: the mediating role of PERMA in sport

期刊

MANAGING SPORT AND LEISURE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2022.2147857

关键词

Bottom-up theory; PERMA; eudaimonic well-being; hedonic well-being; sporting life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the relationship between residents' sporting life and well-being, and finds that moderate physical activity, watching sport, and team identification have positive effects on life satisfaction and flourishing, while sedentary behavior has negative effects. The study also reveals that the effects of sporting life on well-being are mediated by the psychological mechanism of PERMA.
Purpose:This study examines the relationship between residents' sporting life and domain-specific and global well-being, including hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives. Based on the bottom-up theory, we hypothesized the mediating role of PERMA in sport (domain-specific well-being) on the relationship between indicators of sporting life and global well-being (life satisfaction and flourishing).Research methods:Hiroshima residents (n = 946), selected through stratified sampling, participated in an Internet-based survey; we performed structural equation modeling to test the hypothesis model.Results and findings:Consistent with our hypotheses, the study reveals that moderate physical activity (PA), watching sport, and team identification are positively associated with life satisfaction and flourishing, while sedentary behavior is negatively related. However, vigorous PA was not significantly related to life satisfaction or flourishing. All significant indirect effects were fully mediated by PERMA.Implications:These findings contribute to the literature by extending our understanding of the role of sporting life on well-being by highlighting the cumulative impact of sport on daily life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据