3.8 Article

Development of a recovery process of thorium and possible separation of rare earths from Korean monazite

期刊

GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING
卷 25, 期 5-6, 页码 239-245

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/12269328.2022.2158496

关键词

Monazite; leaching; rare earths; thorium; solvent extraction

资金

  1. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant by the Korean government (MSIT)
  2. [CRC-15-06-KIGAM]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systematic studies were conducted to extract rare earths and recover thorium from Korean monazite. The acid baking process was used to transform rare earth elements (REEs) and thorium phosphates into water-soluble sulfates, followed by water leaching. Thorium was separated from the leach liquor using primary amine Primene JM-T, while rare earth elements were separated through solvent extraction technique using Cyanex 572. The study demonstrated effective methods for the extraction and separation of rare earths and thorium from monazite.
Systematic studies were carried out to leach out rare earths and recover thorium from Korean monazite. Monazite was processed with acid baking process (sulfation) where rare earth elements (REEs) and thorium phosphates were transformed to water-soluble sulfates. Various experimental factors such as temperature, H2SO4/monazite concentrate ratio and time were studied to get optimized sulfation system. Near to 88% of leaching of REEs and Th was performed after sulfation followed by water leaching. Moreover, by using 0.1 mol/L of primary amine Primene JM-T (tri-alkyl-methylamine), thorium was separated (more than 95%) from the light rare earth elements present in the leach liquor. Subsequently, rare earth elements were separated by solvent extraction technique using Cyanex 572 as an extractant at different pH conditions. High separation coefficients for different rare earths were obtained with Cyanex 572, while Primene JM-T resulted in the complete separation of the thorium from the leach liquor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据