4.2 Article

Weekend Discharge and Stroke Quality of Care: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Data from a Comprehensive Stroke Center

期刊

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 2962-2967

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.013

关键词

Stroke; quality improvement; database; health education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke collects data on hospital compliance with evidence-based stroke quality of care indicators. Prior work has investigated a link between weekend hospital admission and increased mortality after stroke. There is, however, a paucity of work investigating a similar association between weekend hospital discharge and quality of care. We aimed to determine if weekend discharge affects care to enlighten opportunities for quality improvement. Materials and Methods: Through a retrospective analysis of records from a Comprehensive Stroke Center from July 2010 to June 2015, we identified patients with ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage. Our quality of care indicators were dysphagia screening, rehabilitation assessment, smoking cessation counseling, stroke education, and weight reduction counseling. We created regression models to find adjusted differences in quality of care measure compliance for patients discharged on the weekend. Results: Our analysis included 2737 patients, of which 431 were discharged on the weekend. After adjustment, weekend discharge was significantly associated with reduced stroke education (odds ratio .67, confidence interval .51-0.88, P = .004) and reduced weight reduction counseling (odds ratio .65, confidence interval .45-0.93, P = .018). Conclusions: Hospital discharge on the weekend was associated with an adjusted one-third decrease in odds of stroke education and weight reduction counseling. There is an opportunity for quality improvement in educating stroke patients before hospital discharge on the weekend.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据