4.1 Article

Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients

期刊

BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w

关键词

Adjustment disorder; ADNM-8; ADNM-4; Validation; Oncology; Psycho-oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the factor structure and validity of two assessment tools, ADNM-8 and ADNM-4, in Australian oncology patients. The results suggest that both ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 are useful in assessing adjustment disorder symptoms in cancer patients. Prompt screening of cancer patients can facilitate early intervention and inform treatment decisions.
BackgroundEvidence suggests that up to 30% of cancer patients may meet the criteria for adjustment disorder. However, no assessment instruments have been validated for use with cancer patients. The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM)-8 and ADNM-4 are brief screening tools for adjustment disorder mapped directly to the new ICD-11 criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the factor structure and validity of both instruments in an Australian sample of adult oncology patients. MethodsA total of 405 participants with a cancer diagnosis were recruited online from across Australia. Participants reported cancer-specific information, such as time since diagnosis, treatment stage, cancer stage, type of cancer, and the following questionnaires: 8-item Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM-8), the World Health Organisation Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and the short form Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The predictiveness of stressors was assessed using multiple regression analysis and the structure of the ADNM-8 and the ADNM-4 was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. ResultsSix previously tested models were examined, and the results suggested a 2-factor structure reflecting the two ICD-11 diagnostic criteria clusters of preoccupation with the stressor and failure to adapt was a good fit for both scales. The ADNM-4 outperformed the longer version of the scale on numerous fit indices though the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 were highly correlated. Correlations of both scales with the psychological distress scale, the stress subscale, and the wellbeing index indicated good construct validity.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 are useful screening tools for assessing adjustment disorder symptoms in cancer patients. The prompt screening of cancer patients encourages early intervention for those at risk of adaptation difficulties and informs research and clinical decisions regarding appropriate treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据