4.6 Article

Just Another Gibbs Additive Modeler: Interfacing JAGS and mgcv

期刊

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
卷 75, 期 7, 页码 1-15

出版社

JOURNAL STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v075.i07

关键词

R; BUGS; JAGS; additive model; spline; smooth; generalized additive mixed model

资金

  1. UK EPSRC grant [EP/K005251/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K005251/1, EP/K005251/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K005251/1, EP/K005251/2] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The BUGS language offers a very flexible way of specifying complex statistical models for the purposes of Gibbs sampling, while its JAGS variant offers very convenient R integration via the rjags package. However, including smoothers in JAGS models can involve some quite tedious coding, especially for multivariate or adaptive smoothers. Further, if an additive smooth structure is required then some care is needed, in order to centre smooths appropriately, and to find appropriate starting values. R package mgcv implements a wide range of smoothers, all in a manner appropriate for inclusion in JAGS code, and automates centring and other smooth setup tasks. The purpose of this note is to describe an interface between mgcv and JAGS, based around an R function, jagam, which takes a generalized additive model (GAM) as specified in mgcv and automatically generates the JAGS model code and data required for inference about the model via Gibbs sampling. Although the auto-generated JAGS code can be run as is, the expectation is that the user would wish to modify it in order to add complex stochastic model components readily specified in JAGS. A simple interface is also provided for visualisation and further inference about the estimated smooth components using standard mgcv functionality. The methods described here will be un-necessarily inefficient if all that is required is fully Bayesian inference about a standard GAM, rather than the full flexibility of JAGS. In that case the BayesX package would be more efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据