3.8 Article

Transient loss of consciousness immediately after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma: a case report

期刊

SURGICAL CASE REPORTS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01583-7

关键词

Total pancreatectomy; Pancreatic metastasis; Transient loss of consciousness; Mixed acid-base disorder; Postoperative management

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case highlights the importance of active monitoring of glycemic state and pH after TP due to the potential deterioration caused by TP itself and the lingering effects of anesthesia.
Background Total pancreatectomy (TP) is often selected for treatment of various pancreatic diseases. However, the resultant lack of autoregulation of glycometabolism necessitates careful postoperative management.Case presentation A 77-year-old man who had undergone right nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma 11 years previously presented with multiple histologically diagnosed pancreatic metastases. The patient had no notable comorbidities, including diabetes. Because no extrapancreatic organ metastasis was identified, he underwent TP as a curative treatment. He awoke from anesthesia and was extubated without any problems in the operating room. However, 15 min after entering the intensive care unit, he suddenly lost consciousness and became apneic, resulting in reintubation. Blood gas analysis revealed an increased glucose concentration (302 mg/dL) and mixed acid-base disorder (pH of 7.21) due to insulin insufficiency and fentanyl administration. After induction of continuous intravenous insulin infusion and termination of fentanyl, the glucose concentration and pH gradually improved. He regained clear consciousness and spontaneous ventilation and was extubated the next day with no difficulties or complications.Conclusion This case highlights the importance of active monitoring of the glycemic state and pH after TP because of the possibility of deterioration due to TP itself as well as the lingering effects of anesthesia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据