4.2 Review

Testing parity symmetry of gravity with gravitational waves

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fspas.2022.1109086

关键词

parity symmetry; gravitational waves; circular polarization; birefringence effects; primordial power spectrum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The examination of parity symmetry in gravitational interactions has gained attention, and theories of parity-violating gravity have been proposed. This review summarizes the progress of these theories and focuses on their observable effects in gravitational waves (GWs), particularly the difference between polarization modes. It explores the implications of these theories for GWs generated by compact binary coalescences and primordial GWs. The current and potential constraints on the parity-violating energy scales are presented using current and future GW observations.
The examination of parity symmetry in gravitational interactions has drawn increasing attention. Although Einstein's General Relativity is parity-conserved, numerous theories of parity-violating (PV) gravity in different frameworks have recently been proposed for different motivations. In this review, we briefly summarize the recent progress of these theories, and focus on the observable effects of PV terms in the gravitational waves (GWs), which are mainly reflected in the difference between the left-hand and right-hand polarization modes. We are primarily concerned with the implications of these theories for GWs generated by the compact binary coalescences and the primordial GWs generated in the early Universe. The deviation of GW waveforms and/or primordial power spectrum can always be quantified by the energy scale of parity violation of the theory. Applying the current and future GW observation from laser interferometers and cosmic microwave background radiation, the current and potential constraints on the PV energy scales are presented, which indicates that the parity symmetry of gravity can be tested in high energy scale in this new era of gravitational waves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据