3.8 Article

Transportability Methods for Time-to-Event Outcomes: Application in Adjuvant Colon Cancer Trials

期刊

JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/CCI.22.00088

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NSF, Division of Mathematical Sciences [DMS-1914937]
  2. NSF, Division of Social and Economic Sciences [SES-2149492]
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [5T32ES007142]
  4. US Department of Veterans Affairs [IK2-CX001907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differences in treatment effects were observed in 12 randomized phase III colon cancer adjuvant clinical trials. The reasons for these differences were investigated and it was found that they may be due to the distribution of unobserved covariates or study-level features.
PURPOSEDifferences in the benefits of treatment on 5-year overall survival have been observed in 12 randomized phase III colon cancer adjuvant clinical trials from the ACCENT group. We investigated the reasons for these differences by incorporating the distribution of the observed covariates from each trial.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe applied state-of-the-art transportability methods on the basis of causal inference, and compared them with a conventional meta-analysis approach to predict the treatment effect for the target population. Prediction errors were defined to evaluate whether the identifiability conditions necessary for causal inference were satisfied among the 12 trials, and to measure the performance of each method.RESULTSIn the one-trial-at-a-time transportability analysis, the ranks of prediction errors for the target population were mostly consistent with the discrepancy in treatment effects among the 12 trials across the three models. The overall prediction errors between the leave-one-trial-out transportability method and the conventional individual participant data meta-analysis approach were very similar, and more than 40% lower than the overall prediction errors from the one-trial-at-a-time transportability method.CONCLUSIONThe discrepancy in treatment effects among the 12 trials is unlikely to arise from the choice of model specification or distribution of observed covariates but from the distribution of unobserved covariates or study-level features. The ability to quantify heterogeneity among the 12 trials was greatly reduced in both the leave-one-trial-out transportability method and the conventional meta-analysis approach compared with the one-trial-at-a-time transportability method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据