4.7 Article

Impact of urban-rural medical insurance integration on consumption: Evidence from rural China

期刊

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 837-851

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.09.018

关键词

Policy evaluation; Medical insurance; Household consumption; Rural China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Humanities and Social Science Research Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China
  3. [71974221]
  4. [19YJA630008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study finds that the integration of urban-rural medical insurance policy in China has a significant impact on rural household consumption, particularly non-medical consumption. The effect is more pronounced for households with lower wealth or higher health risks.
Examining the impact of basic medical insurance integration on households' welfare is essential for finding policy solutions to health and welfare inequality. Based on the different timing of implementing the urban-rural medical insurance integration in different prefectural cities in China, we employ a staggered difference-in-differences model to study the impact of this policy on rural household consumption. We find that the integration policy increases the treatment group's non-medical consumption by 14% on average, compared to the control group. The effect is more significant for non-food consumption as the price elasticity of non-food demand is larger than that of food demand. As for the mechanism, we find evidence of the direct channel of reduced medical burden, and we also provide some indirect indication of the precautionary savings channel that the effect of medical insurance on household consumption is more significant for households with lower wealth or higher health risks. The policy implication of our findings is considerable since they provide a strong justification for that social insurance integration might be a solution to narrow the health and welfare gap within China.(c) 2022 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据