4.0 Review

Bioactive compounds, health benefits and valorization of Pyrus pyrifolia (sand pear): a review

期刊

NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/NFS-09-2022-0306

关键词

Bioactive compounds; Health benefits; Nutrition; Pyrus; P; pyrifolia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the origin, distribution and classification, nutritional and bioactive potential, therapeutic potential, and valorization of Pyrus Pyrifolia (Sand Pear), and provides future prospects for its utilization.
PurposePyrus Pyrifolia (Sand Pear) is one of the most underused pear variety despite its nutraceutical potential. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the Pyrus Pyrifolia in term of origin, distribution and classification, nutritional and bioactive potential, therapeutic potential and valorization along with future prospectus. Design/methodology/approachA wide variety of publications (88) were identified through electronic databases (Science direct, PubMed, SciELO, Google scholar, Link springer and Research gate) under the umbrella of different keywords such as bioactive compounds, health benefits, nutrition, sand pear, Pyrus and Pyrus pyrifolia. FindingsPyrus Pyrifolia (Sand Pear) is abundant in nutritional and bioactive compounds such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, terpenoids, vitamins and minerals. It exhibits therapeutic potential as being an antioxidant, anti-obesity, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer agent. However, P. pyrifolia is not much explored by food researchers and industrialists, hence remaining underused. A few attempts have been made toward the use of P. pyrifolia for jam, jelly, candy and wine preparation. However, more research is required for the commercial processing of P. pyrifolia and to enhance its availability outside its growing area. Originality/valueIn this paper, nutritional and bioactive compounds of P. pyrifolia are discussed that provide knowledge to the researchers for its use as a functional ingredient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据