3.8 Article

Managing the elephant in the room: responding to COVID-19's impact on data collection

期刊

NURSE RESEARCHER
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 33-39

出版社

RCNI
DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1874

关键词

Covid-19; coronavirus; data collection; interviews; narrative inquiry; online research; qualitative research; research; research methods

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the challenges faced by researchers due to the COVID-19 pandemic and how they adapted data collection to ensure research continuity. The authors explore the use of video conferencing and telephone interviews as alternative methods and maintain the person-centered approach in their study.
Background The global COVID-19 pandemic has affected data collection for many researchers, in particular research that involves face-to-face interviews. Aim To share learning about the challenges encountered when face-to-face interviews could not continue as planned in a study and how to adapt data collection so that it can continue despite severe disruption. Discussion This article examines the considerations and actions taken by the authors to ensure the continuity of data collection. The research aimed to use narrative inquiry to understand the experiences of significant others supporting people in intensive care units with severe burn injuries. But the pandemic meant the researchers could not meet face-to-face with participants as originally intended and so they had to consider new ways to approach data collection. The authors explore the process of adapting the interviews to video conferencing and telephone use while preserving the study's person-centred focus to remain coherent with narrative methodology. Conclusion Adapting data collection is valuable in ensuring the continuity of research. Careful consideration and planning are required to ensure the research remains robust and ethically sound. Implications for practice Adapting data collection methods can allow for greater flexibility when participants cannot attend face-to-face interviews.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据