4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

G-CSF as an Adjunctive Therapy With Umbilical Cord Blood Cell Transplantation for Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 447-457

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3727/096368915X686913

关键词

Traumatic brain injury (TBI); Stem cells; Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF); Neuroinflammation

资金

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-1-0634]
  2. University of South Florida Signature Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience Funds
  3. University of South Florida
  4. Veterans Administration Reintegration Funds
  5. University of South Florida Neuroscience Collaborative Program
  6. National Institutes of Health [1R01NS071956-01A1]
  7. James and Esther King Biomedical Research Foundation [1KG01-33966]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), a major contributor to deaths and permanent disability worldwide, has been recently described as a progressive cell death process rather than an acute event. TBI pathophysiology is complicated and can be distinguished by the initial primary injury and the subsequent secondary injury that ensues days after the trauma. Therapeutic opportunities for TBI remain very limited with patients subjected to surgery or rehabilitation therapy. The efficacy of stem cell-based interventions, as well as neuroprotective agents in other neurological disorders of which pathologies overlap with TBI, indicates their potential as alternative TBI treatments. Furthermore, their therapeutic limitations may be augmented when combination therapy is pursued instead of using a single agent. Indeed, we demonstrated remarkable combined efficacy of human umbilical cord blood (hUCB) cell therapy and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment in TBI models, providing essential evidence for the translation of this approach to treat TBI. Further studies are warranted to determine the mechanisms underlying therapeutic benefits exerted by hUCB + G-CSF in order to enhance its safety and efficacy in the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据