4.4 Article

International spillovers of US monetary uncertainty and equity market volatility to China's stock markets

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101575

关键词

International spillover; Monetary policy uncertainty; Equity market volatility; Stock market; Granger-causality in quantiles analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the global economy's integration and liberalization, the transmission of U.S. monetary policy surprises across countries has gained scholarly attention. This research examines the causal linkages between U.S. monetary policy uncertainty, equity market volatility, and China's stock price index. The results demonstrate that China's stock price dynamics have minimal impact on U.S. monetary policy uncertainty, while changes in both positive monetary policy uncertainty and stock prices influence equity market volatility.
Due to the global economy that is currently being increasingly integrated and liberalized, the cross-country transmission of U.S. monetary policy surprises has become a critical issue attracting scholarly attention. This research thus extends the existing literature by assessing the causal linkages among U.S. monetary policy uncertainty (USMPU), equity market volatility, and China's stock price index over the period from January 1994 to August 2021. We apply Granger causality in quantile analysis to explore the relationships in each quantile of the distribution in a comprehensible manner. The results indicate that equity market volatility and China's stock price dynamics play little role in affecting USMPU. We also find that only greater changes in both positive monetary policy uncertainty and stock prices lead to changes in equity market volatility. Furthermore, fluctuations in monetary policy uncertainty and equity market volatility in the United States Granger-cause China's stock prices. Knowing such causality results could prevent market participants from adopting a one-size-fits-all strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据