Laminoplasty versus Laminectomy in the Treatment of Primary Spinal Cord Tumors in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of the two approaches for primary spinal cord tumors (PSCTs) in adult patients (laminoplasty [LP] vs. laminectomy [LE]). LE is one of the most common procedures for PSCTs. Despite advantages of LP, it is not yet widely used in the neurosurgical community worldwide. The efficacy of LP vs. LE remains controversial. Adult patients over 18 years of age with PSCT at the level of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were included in the study. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to December 2021. Operation time, hospital stay, complications, and incidence of postoperative spinal deformity (kyphosis or scoliosis were extracted. A total of seven retrospective observational studies with 540 patients were included. There were no significant differences between LP and LE group in operation time (p=0.25) and complications (p=0.48). The LE group showed larger postoperative spinal deformity rate than the LP group (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.84; p=0.01). The LP group had a shorter hospital stay (standardized mean differences, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.34; p=0.0001) than the LE group. Both LP and LE have comparable operative times and total complications in the treatment of PSCT. LP was superior to LE in hospital stay and postoperative spinal deformity rate. However, these findings are limited by the very low quality of the available evidence. Randomized controlled trials are needed for further comparison.

Automated summary

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy (LE) for adult patients with primary spinal cord tumors (PSCTs). LP is not widely used in the neurosurgical community, despite its advantages. The efficacy of LP vs. LE remains controversial. A total of seven observational studies with 540 patients were included. There were no significant differences in operation time and complications between LP and LE groups. The LP group had a shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative spinal deformity rate compared to the LE group. However, these findings are limited by the low quality of available evidence, and further randomized controlled trials are needed for comparison.