4.5 Article

Embryonic Stem Cells and Released Factors Stimulate c-kit(+)/FLK-1(+) Progenitor Cells and Promote Neovascularization in Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiomyopathy

期刊

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 1043-1052

出版社

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096368914X679219

关键词

Doxorubicin; Embryonic stem cells; Cardiomyopathy; Neovascularization

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01HL090646-01, 5R01HL094467-02]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL090646, R01HL094467] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular apoptosis plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of a myriad of cardiac dysfunctions, but has yet to be investigated in doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy (DIC). Additionally, the neovascularization potential and resulting functional consequences of embryonic stem (ES) cells and factors released from these cells in the chronic DIC myocardium remain largely unknown. To this end, we transplanted conditioned media (CM) and ES cells in the DIC-injured heart and evaluated their potential to inhibit vascular cell death, activate endogenous c-kit(+) and FLK-1(+) cells, enhance neovascularization, and augment left ventricular dysfunction. Data presented suggest transplanted CM and ES cells significantly blunt vascular cell apoptosis consequent to DIC. Quantitative immunohistochemistry data demonstrate significantly increased c-kit(+) and FLK-1(+) cells, as well as enhanced differentiated CD31(+) cells in the CM and ES cell groups relative to DIC controls. Heart function, including fractional shortening and ejection fraction, assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, was significantly improved following CM and ES cell transplantation. In conclusion, our data suggest that transplantation of CM and ES cells inhibit vascular apoptosis, activate endogenous c-kit(+) and FLK-1(+) cells and differentiate them into endothelial cells, enhance neovascularization, and improve cardiac function in the DIC-injured myocardium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据