4.1 Article

Is FDI a potential tool for boosting firm's performance? Firm level evidence from Ecuador

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 341-391

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-022-00806-2

关键词

Foreign Direct Investment; Spillovers; Firm Performance; Ecuador

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evidence on the effects of FDI on firm-level economic and financial performance in developing countries is mixed. To contribute to this research, we examine the effects of FDI on firm performance in Ecuador using different performance measures. Our results show that firms with inward FDI experience faster growth and higher levels of gross revenues. We also find both positive and negative spillover effects of FDI on different performance indicators.
In developing countries, the evidence regarding the direct and indirect effects of FDI on economic and financial performance at the firm level is mixed. To contribute to this literature, we provide empirical evidence of direct and indirect effects of FDI on firm's performance, using return on assets (ROA), gross revenues and gross revenues growth rate as performance measures. We examine the private formal enterprise sector in Ecuador from 2007 to 2018. Our identification strategy relies on the use of the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) methodology for dynamic panel data which allows us to control for potential endogeneity, autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity issues. The results suggest that firms with inward FDI grow faster than their counterparts, and firms with higher amounts of FDI as a share of total revenues have on average higher levels of gross revenues. Moreover, we find negative horizontal wages and gross revenues spillover effects on gross revenues growth rates, but positive horizontal gross revenues spillover effects on ROA. There is also significant evidence of negative horizontal spillover effects in all economic sectors, whereas evidence for forward and backward spillovers is heterogeneous across them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据