4.6 Review

Active learning spaces design and assessment: a qualitative systematic literature review

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2163263

关键词

Higher education; active learning; pedagogical innovation; flexible learning environments; technology-enriched places

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a systematic literature review on Active Learning Spaces (ALS) in Higher Education, aiming to map the state of the art and identify common orientations for the design and assessment of ALS. The results show the centrality of collaborative learning and technology-enhanced environments in ALS, but also highlight the need for future research on the impact of different layouts on teaching practices and student learning.
As spaces, physical or virtual, are change agents and can have an impact on learning, the power of built pedagogy is being acknowledged in Higher Education. Emphasis is being placed on the design of Active Learning Spaces (ALS) and its impact on pedagogy, by fostering active learning. However, the field is fragmented, due to a profusion of terms for ALS, lacking systematization. This paper presents a systematic literature review on ALS with a focus on the concepts, design principles, teaching and learning strategies, educational resources, assessment criteria and spaces typologies. It aims to map the state of the art and identify common orientations to inform the design and assessment of ALS. The results show that studies in ALS emphasize the centrality of students' learning through collaborative work and supported by technology-enhanced environments. Despite the profusion of designations, its definitions generally focus on pedagogical strategies, technology-enhanced learning principles, collaborative aspects and interdisciplinarity and transferable skills, albeit with different importance levels. It also shows that research in this area is small-scale and empirically weak. Considering the assessment of ALS usage, future research on the impact of different layouts (pedagogy, furniture, and technology) both on teachers' practices and on students' learning is highly recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据