4.2 Article

Enhancing social inclusion in sport: Dynamics of action research in super-diverse contexts

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10126902221140462

关键词

social inclusion; action research; cultural diversity; social change; sport clubs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the development of an action research project aimed at supporting the co-creation of inclusive climates in sports clubs in culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Melbourne, Australia. The findings indicate that the collaborative process of assessing clubs' diversity and inclusion climates had an impact on participants' awareness of inequities and exclusionary practices, and the co-creation of strategies for change brought together diverse perspectives. The paper reflects on the implications and limitations of the action research for promoting equitable social inclusion for culturally and linguistically diverse migrants in community sport.
There are systemic and longstanding inequalities in sport participation for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) migrants. Drawing on theoretical foundations of critical pedagogy and social justice education, as well as a public sociology perspective, this paper examines the development of an action research (AR) project to support the co-creation of inclusive climates in sports clubs in CALD communities in Melbourne, Australia. We use artefacts from collaborative sessions, interviews, and surveys to analyse the AR's impact on participating community sport leaders' awareness and practice. The findings indicate how the collaborative process of assessing clubs' diversity and inclusion climates affected participants' awareness of inequities and exclusionary practices, and how the co-creation of strategies for change brought together diverse perspectives. We reflect on the implications and limitations of the AR for research practice aimed at promoting equitable social inclusion for CALD migrants in community sport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据