Monolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of control: Arguments and alternatives

Herein, we contextualize, problematize, and offer some insights for moving beyond the problem of monolingual comparative normativity in (psycho) linguistic research on bilingualism. We argue that, in the vast majority of cases, juxtaposing (functional) monolinguals to bilinguals fails to offer what the comparison is supposedly intended to do: meet the standards of empirical control in line with the scientific method. Instead, the default nature of monolingual comparative normativity has historically contributed to inequalities in many facets of bilingualism research and continues to impede progress on multiple levels. Beyond framing our views on the matter, we offer some epistemological considerations and methodological alternatives to this standard practice that improve empirical rigor while fostering increased diversity, inclusivity, and equity in our field.

Automated summary

In this article, we discuss the problem of monolingual comparative normativity in (psycho) linguistic research on bilingualism and propose alternative approaches to improve empirical rigor and promote diversity, inclusivity, and equity in the field. We argue that the practice of juxtaposing monolinguals and bilinguals often fails to meet the standards of empirical control and has contributed to inequalities in bilingualism research. We offer epistemological considerations and methodological alternatives to address this issue.