4.3 Article

A framework for conceptualising early intervention for eating disorders

期刊

EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 320-334

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/erv.2959

关键词

anorexia nervosa; bulimia nervosa; early intervention; eating disorders; mental health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early intervention plays an important role in the treatment of eating disorders, but many people still face barriers to accessing timely treatment. There are variations and inequalities in eating disorder care provision worldwide. However, evidence-based approaches to early intervention exist and progress is being made in this area. Action steps are needed to transform eating disorder service provision and ensure early detection, treatment, and recovery for all individuals affected by eating disorders.
ObjectiveThis paper outlines the evidence base for early intervention for eating disorders; provides a global overview of how early intervention for eating disorders is provided in different regions and settings; and proposes policy, service, clinician and research recommendations to progress early intervention for eating disorders. Method and ResultsCurrently, access to eating disorder treatment often takes many years or does not occur at all. This is despite neurobiological, clinical and socioeconomic evidence showing that early intervention may improve outcomes and facilitate full sustained recovery from an eating disorder. There is also considerable variation worldwide in how eating disorder care is provided, with marked inequalities in treatment provision. Despite these barriers, there are existing evidence-based approaches to early intervention for eating disorders and progress is being made in scaling these. ConclusionsWe propose action steps for the field that will transform eating disorder service provision and facilitate early detection, treatment and recovery for everyone affected by eating disorders, regardless of age, socioeconomic status and personal characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据