4.3 Article

Managing and resisting workplace reorganization: Labor-management relations in a pre-digital media corporation

期刊

JOURNALISM
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/14648849221138727

关键词

labor; management; political economy; resistance; unions; work; class; journalism history

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines how newsworkers resisted workplace reorganization in the pre-digital news industry. It analyzes a case study of corporate control and worker resistance from 1994 to 1995 to understand the dynamics of workplace reorganization and union resistance. By developing the concept of alternative communication resistance practices and conducting a thematic analysis of archival documents, the article provides insights into the historical and institutional factors that shape workplace reorganization and resistance.
This article examines how newsworkers resisted workplace reorganization in the pre-digital news industry. It analyzes how and why the Thomson Corporation reorganized the workplace and unions resisted workplace change from 1994 to 1995 as a case study of corporate control and worker resistance. Developing the concept of alternative communication resistance practices, it conducts a thematic analysis of untapped archival documents: union, company, legal, and news content. This concept articulates historically-contingent institutional conditions that facilitate corporate strategies to reorganize the workplace and union resistance practices. This article contributes an original relational framework to understand what is distinct about workplace reorganization at a particular setting. It considers workplace actors' heterogeneous resistance practices within a specific workplace context and how communication practices express and constitute resistance. The article outlines five propositions of this framework that could be tested and potentially refined beyond a single case study in future (digital) journalism research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据