4.1 Article

Treatment Decision-Making Preferences of Older Depressed Minority Primary Care Patients

期刊

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 719-727

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-01055-0

关键词

Decision-making; Depression treatment preferences; Minority; Health disparities; Primary care; Geriatrics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little research has examined the decision-making preferences of older, racially and ethnically diverse minority patients with untreated depression. This study found that majority of these patients preferred shared decision-making, and female gender was associated with a more active involvement in the decision-making process for depression treatment. The results suggest that physicians should consider the preferences of older, minority patients in order to improve communication and adherence to mental health care.
Little research examined the decision-making preferences of older, racially and ethnically diverse minority patients with untreated depression. The study's aims were to identify decision-making preferences and the characteristics associated with a more active preference in the decision-making process for general medical and depression treatment decisions. We assessed the preferred involvement in making general medical and depression treatment decisions of 201 older primary care patients with untreated depression. Linear regressions examined the association of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with decision-making preference for both decision types. Majority of patients preferred shared decision-making for general medical and depression treatments. Female gender was associated with a preference for active decision-making for depression treatment. For this sample older depressed patients preferred sharing the decision-making responsibilities with physicians. To improve communication and the initiation and adherence to mental health care, physicians must consider older, minority patients' preferences for involvement in the decision-making process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据