4.3 Article

Utility of temporal self-regulation theory in health and social behaviours: A meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 397-438

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12631

关键词

health behaviour; intention-behaviour gap; meta-analysis; social behaviour; temporal self-regulation theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of temporal self-regulation theory to understand behavior. The findings suggest that the theory can explain behavior, although the effect sizes vary from weak to moderate. The strength of associations also varies across different behavior types and contexts. The study highlights the importance of assessing and reporting interactions to better understand the drivers of behavior and develop effective interventions.
PurposeTemporal self-regulation theory was developed to address an observed intention-behaviour gap across behaviours. However, a synthesis of studies has not yet been conducted to investigate the theory's utility to explain behaviour and bridge the intention-behaviour gap. This review aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of temporal self-regulation theory to understanding behaviour and pre-registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021253174). MethodForward citation searches on the original theory publication through Google Scholar until May 2021 identified 37 eligible articles, including, 12,555 participants assessing at least two of the three theory constructs. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed the strength of associations between theory constructs on behaviour and random effects meta-regressions assessed moderators of behaviour. ResultsFindings provide support for temporal self-regulation theory to explain behaviour with very weak (self-regulatory capacity r = .039, CI = .00, -.07) to moderate (intention r = .331, CI = .26, .40; behavioural pre-potency r = .379, CI = .32, .44) effect sizes. Further, the strength of associations varied across behaviour types and contexts. However, there was high heterogeneity across studies and some moderating effects could not be assessed due to insufficient numbers of studies assessing interactions. ConclusionsWe urge researchers to assess and report interactions for better understanding of the drivers of behaviour to develop effective interventions for positive behaviour change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据