4.7 Article

Sensing urban soundscapes from street view imagery

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101915

关键词

Urban planning; GeoAI; Perception; Spatial analysis; Deep learning; Built environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on machine learning, a new application of street view imagery is introduced to estimate large-area high-resolution urban soundscapes. This approach enables low-cost but accurate and detailed sensing of urban soundscapes, providing an alternative means to generate soundscape maps.
A healthy acoustic environment is an essential component of sustainable cities. Various noise monitoring and simulation techniques have been developed to measure and evaluate urban sounds. However, sensing large areas at a fine resolution remains a great challenge. Based on machine learning, we introduce a new application of street view imagery - estimating large-area high-resolution urban soundscapes, investigating the premise that we can predict and characterize soundscapes without laborious and expensive noise measurements. First, visual features are extracted from street-level imagery using computer vision. Second, fifteen soundscape indicators are identified and a survey is conducted to gauge them solely from images. Finally, a prediction model is constructed to infer the urban soundscape by modeling the non-linear relationship between them. The results are verified with extensive field surveys. Experiments conducted in Singapore and Shenzhen using half a million images affirm that street view imagery enables us to sense large-scale urban soundscapes with low cost but high accuracy and detail, and provides an alternative means to generate soundscape maps. R2 reaches 0.48 by evaluating the predicted results with field data collection. Further novelties in this domain are revealing the contributing visual elements and spatial laws of soundscapes, underscoring the usability of crowdsourced data, and exposing in-ternational patterns in perception.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据