4.3 Article

Control over reward gain unlocks the reward cue motivational salience

期刊

MOTIVATION AND EMOTION
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 495-508

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-022-10001-2

关键词

Attention; Incentive salience; Locus of control; Reward; Attentional capture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Events in life can be perceived to be under our own control or independent from our will, known as internal vs external locus-of-control. This study investigated whether the control over reward gain can influence attentional salience of reward cues. Experiment 1 showed that stimuli associated with internal control gained attentional salience. However, Experiment 2 revealed that internal control alone is not enough to confer attentional salience to reward cues. Additionally, Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiment 1 and excluded alternative explanations. The findings suggest that reward-cue attentional salience is influenced by both reward value and control over reward gain.
Events in life can be perceived to be under our own control, or to occur independently from our will, two psychological styles known as internal vs external locus-of-control respectively. While it is established that positive events like reward-predicting stimuli attract attention, whether the control over reward gain can also influence the attentional salience of reward cues is unknown. Here, we systematically manipulated the control in reward gain to investigate this possibility in humans. Experiment 1 showed that stimuli associated with an internal control in reward attainment gained attentional salience. However, Experiment 2 showed that the internal control alone is not sufficient to confer attentional salience to reward-cues. Finally, Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiment 1 and served also the purpose to exclude alternative accounts. Our findings show that the reward-cue attentional salience is not only affected by reward value, but also by the control over reward gain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据