4.3 Article

Development of a Short-Form Stroke Impact Scale Using a Machine Learning Algorithm for Patients at the Subacute Stage

期刊

出版社

AMER OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2022.049136

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 110-2628-B-038-013, MOST 109-2314-B-038-147, MOST 109-2314-B-002-110-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to develop a short-form SIS 3.0 using a machine learning algorithm, which showed good comparability in predicting original domain scores, sufficient concurrent validity with SIS 3.0, and satisfactory convergent validity.
Importance: Several short forms of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SIS 3.0) have been proposed in order to decrease its administration time of about 20 min. However, none of the short-form scores are comparable to those of the original measure. Objective: To develop a short-form SIS 3.0 using a machine learning algorithm (ML-SIS).Design: We developed the ML-SIS in three stages. First, we calculated the frequencies of items having the highest contribution to predicting the original domain scores across 50 deep neural networks. Second, we iteratively selected the items showing the highest frequency until the coefficient of determination (R2) of each domain was & GE;.90. Third, we examined the comparability and concurrent and convergent validity of the ML-SIS.Setting: Hospitals.Participants: We extracted complete data for 1,010 patients from an existing data set.Results: Twenty-eight items were selected for the ML-SIS. High average R2s (.90-.96) and small average residuals (mean absolute errors and root-mean-square errors = 0.49-2.84) indicate good comparability. High correlations (rs = .95-.98) between the eight domain scores of the ML-SIS and the SIS 3.0 indicate sufficient concurrent validity. Similar interdomain correlations between the two measures indicate satisfactory convergent validity.Conclusions and Relevance: The ML-SIS uses about half of the items in the SIS 3.0, has an estimated administration time of 10 min, and provides valid scores comparable to those of the original measure. Thus, the ML-SIS may be an efficient alternative to the SIS 3.0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据