4.2 Article

Mapping Chinese Personality: An Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the NEO-PI-3 in Monolingual and Bilingual Studies

期刊

ASSESSMENT
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 2031-2049

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10731911221126921

关键词

NEO-PI-3; NEO-PI-R; Chinese Circumplex Model of Affect; bilingual studies; Chinese personality; measurement invariance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese versions of NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 and found that the Chinese NEO-PI-3 had a strong factor structure, high reliability, and slightly better internal consistency compared to NEO-PI-R. The study also explored the affective underpinnings of personality factors and well-being measures using the Chinese Circumplex Model of Affect.
The NEO-PI-3 is a fourth-generation instrument that has been shown to improve the psychometrics and readability of its immediate precedent, the NEO-PI-R. We examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese versions of the NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 using three datasets (Ns = 913, 299, 403) collected using both monolingual and bilingual designs. The Chinese NEO-PI-3 scales displayed a five-factor structure in which the facets had the highest loadings on their intended factors. The structure demonstrated strong invariance across both languages (English vs. Chinese) and gender groups, maintained high test-retest reliability, and attained slightly better internal consistency than the NEO-PI-R. We also examined the affective underpinnings of personality factors and well-being measures using the Chinese Circumplex Model of Affect. Consistent with past findings, Neuroticism and Extraversion were most related to affect, while Satisfaction with Life and Subjective Happiness shared the affective core of pleasant feelings and medium arousal. Based on these results, the Chinese NEO-PI-3 appears to be a sound instrument to measure personality in Chinese communities and to compare personality across cultures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据