4.7 Article

Measuring the associations between eye-level urban design quality and on-street crime density around New York subway entrances

期刊

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102728

关键词

Urban design qualities; Subway entrance; CPTED; Street view imagery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between urban design quality and crime density around subway stations, finding significant associations between them. Certain design elements are related to higher crime risk while others are related to lower crime risk.
The relationship between crimes, fear of crimes, and the physical environments of metro stations are interlocked. They ultimately influence metro safety and ridership, which are essential for not only urban life quality but also the environmental and fiscal sustainability of regional management. This study mainly investigates how the urban design quality (UDQ) of the ground-level environments surrounding subway stations, both how they express (objectively) and how they are perceived (subjectively), is associated with the reported crime density on streets. To extend conventionally interested 'broken window theory', multi-dimensional UDQs highly valued in urban planning literature are measured for metro entrances in New York through the applications of Street View Imagery (SVI), computer vision (CV) and machine learning (ML). Significant associations are found between UDQs and crime densities overbearing the integration of socioeconomic and land use factors. 'Person', 'Safety' and 'Complexity' are associated with higher crime density, while 'Bench', 'Streetlight', 'Skyscraper', 'Human Scale', and 'Imageability' are related to lower crime risk. By bridging urban planning and criminology literature, this study provides new insights into Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). It contributes to the literature with an efficient approach for urbanists and criminologists to replicate for future studies in microenvironments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据