4.7 Article

Trust in institutions and public acceptability of risky energy production: Testing the causal relationships in the context of Groningen earthquakes

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102927

关键词

Trust in institutions; Public acceptability of energy production; Causal model of trust; Associationist model of trust; Natural gas extraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acceptability of energy production by the public is not only dependent on their opinions of energy projects but also on their trust in regulating institutions. This study aimed to fill the gap in causal inferences regarding the relationship between trust and public acceptability by studying the association between trust in regulating institutions associated with energy production and public acceptability of natural gas extraction in the Netherlands longitudinally. The results partially support the causal model of trust, showing that trust in one of the studied regulating institutions influenced subsequent acceptability ratings in 2 out of 5 measurement waves.
Public acceptability of energy production does not only depend on people's opinions of energy projects but also on whether people trust those who are in charge of regulating them. Indeed, research shows that trust in regulating institutions is positively related to public acceptability of energy production, and more generally, to public acceptability hazard-prone activities. Most evidence for this relationship, however, stems from correla-tional and cross-sectional studies and therefore causal inferences regarding its directionality cannot be made. That is, is not clear whether trust is an antecedent of public acceptability (the causal model of trust) or whether trust is rather a consequence of it (the associationist model of trust). In this study, we aimed to fill this gap by studying longitudinally the association between trust in two relevant regulating institutions associated with energy production in the Netherlands and public acceptability of natural gas extraction. Overall, results provided (partial) support to the causal model of trust -that is, trust in one of studied regulating institutions influenced subsequent acceptability ratings in 2 (out of 5) measurement waves. Further, both trust and public acceptability tended to be stable over time. Results are discussed in relation to the literature on trust in institutions and its effects on the acceptability of hazard-prone activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据