4.5 Article

Artificial neural network and response surface methodology for optimization of corrosion inhibition of mild steel in 1 M HCl by Musa paradisiaca peel extract

期刊

HELIYON
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11955

关键词

Artificial neural network; Banana peel extract; Corrosion; Inhibition; Response surface methodology; Optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, banana peel extract was used as an environmentally friendly corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in hydrochloric acid. The inhibition efficiency was assessed by monitoring the pH of the acid solution and the evolution of hydrogen gas, and optimized using response surface methodology and artificial neural network. The results showed that the concentration of the extract had an impact on the corrosion inhibition efficiency, and the optimum conditions were determined. Both RSM and ANN were found to be effective optimization techniques, with ANN providing accurate predictions even with limited data.
Banana (Musa paradisiaca) peel extract (BPE) was used as an environmentally benign corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in 1.0 M HCl. The efficiency of BPE was assessed by monitoring the pH of HCl solution and the quantity of hydrogen gas evolved during the reaction, using gasometric and thermometric methods. Moreover, the effect of concentration and temperature on the inhibition efficiency was modelled and optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). It was observed that the evolution of hydrogen gas decreases with increasing concentration of BPE, while it increases with time for the various concentrations up till 8 min before attaining constant values. By numerical optimization of RSM, the optimum corrosion inhibition efficiency of 60.08% was obtained at 308.08 K and concentration of 7.44 g/L for gasometric method, while an optimum of 61.25% was obtained at 308 K and 7.50 g/L for thermometric method. Optimization of inhibition parameters with ANN revealed the optimum number of neurons for both gasometric and thermometric methods to be 7; while the MSE are 2.2788 and 2.7306, and R2 are 96.21 and 98.86 respectively. Comparing the performance models of RSM and ANN: for gasometric method, R2 was 98.93 for RSM and 96.21 for ANN, while for thermometric method, R2 was obtained as 95.78 and 98.86 for RSM and ANN, respectively. Both RSM and ANN have demonstrated to be robust optimization techniques; particularly, ANN was found to give a good prediction of the available small dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据