4.5 Article

Stability of vitamin A, E, C and thiamine during storage of different powdered enteral formulas

期刊

HELIYON
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11460

关键词

Enteral formulas; Vitamin A; Vitamin E; Vitamin C; Thiamine; Stability

资金

  1. National Key R & D Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2021YFD2100100]
  4. [32171836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the changes in vitamin A, E, C, and thiamine in two different commercial enteral formulas during different storage conditions. The results showed that the content of vitamin A, E, and thiamine decreased with an increase in temperature or time, while the level of vitamin C remained stable. The vitamins exhibited more stability at a storage temperature of 25℃, relative humidity of 60%. The degradation of vitamins A, E, and thiamine during storage followed first order kinetic equations.
In this study, two different kinds of commercial enteral formulas were selected to evaluate the changes of vitamin A, E, C and thiamine during the different storage conditions of different temperature and relative humidity (60 +/- 1 degrees C, 60 +/- 5% for 5 and 10 days; 37 +/- 1 degrees C, 75 +/- 5% for 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 months; 25 +/- 1 degrees C, 60 +/- 5% for 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months). The results showed that as the temperature or time increased, the content of vitamin A, E and thiamine was gradually decreased whilst the level of vitamin C remained stable. The vitamins exhibited more stability at the storage of 25 +/- 1 degrees C, RH 60 +/- 5%. Vitamin A and thiamine decreased more in the polymeric formula (EFA) than that in the oligomeric formula (EFB), while, vitamin E decreased less in EFA than that in EFB. The kinetics of vitamin A, E and thiamine degradation during storage followed first order kinetic equations. Furthermore, the final levels of vitamins were higher than the minimum level recommended by legislation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据