Transcranial direct current stimulation with virtual reality versus virtual reality alone for upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A meta-analysis

Background: Stroke is one of the most prevalent diseases. Motor impairment in patients with stroke frequently affects the upper extremities. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tried to prove whether or not the combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with virtual reality (VR) is superior to VR alone for upper extremity rehabilitation. Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library database, and Clinicaltrials.gov for relevant RCTs published before June 10, 2022. The results were analyzed by using stan-dard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: We pooled 120 patients from 4 RCTs. There were no significant improvements in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI,-0.04 to 1.06), the Box and Block Test (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI,-0.02 to 0.86), and the Modified Ashworth Scale after the combined treatment of tDCS and VR. But tDCS combined with VR could enhance the Barthel Index scores in patients with stroke compared to VR alone (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.94). Conclusions: The combination of tDCS and VR can improve the quality of daily living in patients with stroke. No more satisfactory efficacy has been demonstrated in terms of upper extremity function. However, we observe a distinct trend toward significance in some outcomes.

Automated summary

This study analyzed data from four randomized clinical trials and found that the combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with virtual reality (VR) did not significantly improve upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients compared to VR alone. However, tDCS combined with VR was shown to enhance Barthel Index scores, thereby improving the quality of daily living in stroke patients.