4.7 Article

Measuring urban ecological network resilience: A disturbance scenario simulation method

期刊

CITIES
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104057

关键词

Ecological network; Network resilience; Disturbance; Scenario simulation; Shenzhen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to analyze indicators of urban-scale ecological network resilience, using Shenzhen as an empirical research case. The results showed that Shenzhen's ecological network structure was relatively stable, with the first 30% of nodes having a significant impact on network resilience. These findings are practically important for formulating spatial planning and management policies for cities.
Human disturbance of urban ecosystems is intensifying, as is ecological fragmentation. As such, effective connections between green spaces must be established and restored to form structurally resilient urban ecological networks. In this study, we focused on indicators of city-scale ecological network resilience. We constructed a network model, analyzed the disturbance simulation results, and identified key nodes. Shenzhen, a megacity in China was selected for empirical research. First, we used Floyd algorithm to extract least-cost paths and then generate the corridor network, constructing an ecological network model with 386 nodes and 4910 edges. Second, focusing on the nodes of the constructed ecological network, we adopted a selected attack strategy to conduct dynamic simulations, using two parameters, network efficiency and maximum connectivity, to evaluate the resilience of the ecological network to changes under various disturbance scenarios. The results showed that the ecological network structure in the study area was relatively stable, and the first 30 % of nodes substantially impacted network resilience. The outcomes reflect the state of urban ecosystems that have been disturbed by socio-economic systems and are practically important for formulating adaptive spatial planning and management policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据