4.7 Article

Modeling urban land-use changes using a landscape-driven patch-based cellular automaton (LP-CA)

期刊

CITIES
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103906

关键词

Landscape pattern; Cellular automata; Urban land -use change; Land -use patch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular automaton (CA) is a useful tool for modeling land-use changes, and the patch-based CA model is superior to the cell-based CA model in considering local-scale spatial homogeneity of urban growth. However, traditional patch-based CA lacks the incorporation of landscape pattern information. To address this limitation, a novel landscape-driven patch-based CA model is proposed, which can consider both landscape similarity and cell-by-cell agreement.
Cellular automaton (CA) is a widely-used tool for modeling land-use changes that can enhance our understanding of past and future urban development. Previous studies have demonstrated that patch-based CA models are superior to cell-based CA because the spatial homogeneity of urban growth at local scales can be considered. However, there still exists a major limitation that traditional patch-based CA did not incorporate any information about landscape pattern into land-use change modeling. To alleviate this issue, we present a novel landscape -driven patch-based CA (LP-CA) model that can simultaneously consider landscape similarity and cell-by-cell agreement. We have examined this new model by simulating and predicting the urban expansion in a fast-growing city. Results indicate that our method performs better than stand-alone traditional patch-based CA and landscape-driven cell-based CA in terms of the combined error. The capability to characterize and replicate landscape pattern is greatly important for urban planners to explore the potential influences of urban expansion under different land-use planning scenarios. Therefore, this proposed model has the potential to provide valuable support for urban land-use planning and policy-making processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据