4.5 Article

Exploring the meaning of happiness of middle childhood children

期刊

CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106659

关键词

Meaning of happiness; Sources of happiness; Contributor of happiness; Middle childhood

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the meaning and sources of happiness for children in the Indonesian context. Findings reveal that positive affect, engaging in enjoyable activities, receiving and achieving things, relating with others, having a positive physical condition, performing religious activities, and special days or events contribute to children's happiness. Both family members and non-family members play a role in children's happiness.
Recognizing the importance of childhood happiness as a quality-of-life indicator, as well as the scarcity of studies that have been carried out concerning the happiness of children in Indonesian context, this study aims to explore the meaning, situations, and people who generate a feeling of happiness for children in Indonesian context. This research took an inductive, exploratory approach involving 46 middle childhood children as respondents (50% boys, 50% girls, Mage = 7,76). Data were collected through interviews and analyzed using a thematic analysis framework. Findings of this research revealed several themes emerge as meaning as well as sources of happiness: 1) Positive affect; 2) doing enjoyable activities; 3) receiving something; 4) achieving something; 5) relating with others; 6) having a positive physical condition; 7) performing religious activities; and 8) special days or events. Furthermore, both family and non-family members contribute a share in children's happiness. The results confirm the findings of previous studies conducted in the context of younger children and studies in Western and Asian countries. Additional findings and suggestions for further research are discussed further in a more comprehensive manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据