4.5 Article

Effect of sodium oxybate on disrupted nighttime sleep in patients with narcolepsy

期刊

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 407-414

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12468

关键词

cataplexy; polysomnography; sleep architecture; sleep continuity; sleep quality; sleep stage shifts

资金

  1. Jazz Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This post hoc analysis evaluated the dose-related effects of sodium oxybate on sleep continuity and nocturnal sleep quality in patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy. Polysomnography data, including shifts to Stage N1/Wake, were from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sodium oxybate. Patients were 16years old with a diagnosis of narcolepsy including symptoms of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness. Treatment was for 8weeks with placebo or sodium oxybate 4.5, 6 or 9g administered as two equally divided nightly doses. Relative to baseline, significant dose-dependent reductions in the number of shifts per hour from Stages N2/3/rapid eye movement and Stages N2/3 to Stage N1/Wake were observed at week 8 with sodium oxybate (P<0.05); sodium oxybate 6- and 9-g doses also resulted in similar reductions in shifts per hour of rapid eye movement to Stage N1/Wake (both P<0.05). Across all shift categories, the shift reductions with sodium oxybate 9g were significantly greater than those observed with placebo (P<0.05). Improvements from baseline in reported sleep quality were significantly greater with sodium oxybate 4.5 and 9g at week 8 (P<0.05). Correlations between change from baseline in number of shifts per hour to Stage N1/Wake and cataplexy frequency, patient-reported nocturnal sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale were numerically highest for the sodium oxybate 9-g dose across all sleep stage shift categories. In these patients with narcolepsy, sodium oxybate showed improvements in the sleep continuity and nocturnal sleep quality that are characteristic of disrupted nighttime sleep ( identifier NCT00049803).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据