4.7 Article

The relationships between happiness motives and problematic smartphone use in young adults: A weekly diary study

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107557

关键词

Hedonic motives; Eudaimonic motives; Problematic smartphone use; Diary study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the relationship between happiness motives and problematic smartphone use (PSU). The results showed that hedonic motives were positively associated with PSU, while eudaimonic motives were negatively associated with it. Specifically, hedonic motives in the previous week predicted PSU in the following week, indicating a reciprocal relationship between the two. However, there was no predictive relationship between eudaimonic motives and PSU.
Problematic smartphone use (PSU) is a recent concern resulting from the dramatic increase in worldwide smartphone use. Although prior studies have indicated the between-person relationship between happiness motives and PSU, less is known about the within-person connection. This study investigated the week-to-week associations between PSU and two types of happiness motives (i.e., hedonic motives and eudaimonic motives) using a weekly diary design. A sample of 270 young adults (Mage = 19.06 years, SD = 0.88 years) completed the online questionnaires once a week for ten consecutive weeks. The results indicated that hedonic motives were positively linked with PSU while eudaimonic motives were negatively associated with it in the same week. More importantly, the multilevel cross-lagged path analysis showed that hedonic motives from the previous week positively predicted PSU in the following week. There was also a reverse relationship between them, whereas there was no predictive relationship between eudaimonic motives and PSU. These results provide convincing evidence that the two types of happiness motives play different roles in the development of PSU, and for the reciprocal relationships between hedonic motives and PSU.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据