4.7 Article

How teacher and classmate support relate to students' stress and academic achievement

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992497

关键词

teacher support; peer support; helplessness; ability to cope; academic achievement; multilevel analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the conservation of resources theory, social support is crucial for helping students overcome challenges. This study emphasizes the important role of both teacher support and peer support in students' ability to cope and academic achievement through multilevel analysis. Peer support at the class level is related to students' coping ability and academic achievement, while teacher support at the individual level is negatively associated with coping ability and helplessness. Gender, socio-economic status, and neuroticism were also considered as covariates.
According to the conservation of resources theory, social support provides resources to help overcome challenges. Although some empirical findings have emphasized the pivotal role of teacher support and/or peer support for students' stress and academic achievement, multilevel analyses that consider contextual class and individual student effects are scarce. The current study addresses this gap and further includes gender, socio-economic status, and neuroticism as covariates. Multilevel analyses in Mplus were conducted. All measures were taken at the student level and then aggregated to the classroom level to estimate class-level relationships. Results revealed that on the individual level, teacher support was related to higher ability to cope and lower levels of helplessness, while on the class level, peer support by classmates was related to higher ability to cope and academic achievement. The context effects also show that in classes with higher peer support, students are more likely to benefit in terms of coping ability and achievement, whereas in classes with higher teacher support, students tend to show less coping ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据