4.7 Article

Effect of sterilization processes on alginate/gelatin inks for three-dimensional printing

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 309-319

出版社

WHIOCE PUBL PTE LTD
DOI: 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.645

关键词

Inks; Three-dimensional printing; Constructs; Sterilization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sterilization is a crucial step in the development of bioinks for tissue engineering. This study compared the effects of UV radiation, filtration, and autoclaving on alginate/gelatin inks. The results showed that UV samples exhibited shear thinning behavior and produced 3D-printed constructs with better shape fidelity. FTIR analysis confirmed the prevalence of α-helix structure in UV samples. This work emphasizes the importance of sterilization in the research field of bioinks.
Sterilization is a crucial step in the process of developing bioinks for tissue engineering applications. In this work, alginate/gelatin inks were subjected to three sterilization methods: ultraviolet (UV) radiation, filtration (FILT), and autoclaving (AUTO). In addition, to simulate the sterilization effect in a real environment, inks were formulated in two different media, specifically, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). First, rheological tests were performed to evaluate the flow properties of the inks, and we observed that UV samples showed shear thinning behavior, which was favorable for three-dimensional (3D) printing. Furthermore, the 3D-printed constructs developed with UV inks showed better shape and size fidelity than those obtained with FILT and AUTO. In order to relate this behavior to the material structure, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis was carried out and the predominant conformation in protein was determined by deconvolution of the amide I band, which confirmed that the prevalence of a-helix structure was greater for UV samples. This work highlights the relevance of sterilization processes, which are essential for biomedical applications, in the research field of bioinks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据