4.7 Article

Lattice-shaped ground improvement by mixing soil and alkali-activated slag for liquefaction mitigation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01445

关键词

Liquefaction; Deep soil mixing; Alkali -activated slag; Pile foundation; Earthquake response

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41902287, 52020105002]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [202102010436]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alkali-activated slag (AAS) is an environmentally friendly material that has shown great potential in soil improvement. This study found that AAS is effective in strengthening liquefiable soil and can mitigate liquefaction when used in deep soil mixing (DSM) technology.
Alkali-activated slag (AAS), an environmentally friendly material, has recently attracted increasing attention for applications in soil improvement. However, most of the studies focused on the geomechanical behavior of non-liquefiable soils strengthened with AAS. The objectives of this study are to examine whether AAS is effective for strengthening liquefiable soil and to evaluate the effectiveness of AAS in deep soil mixing (DSM) technology for mitigation of liquefaction. The mechanical properties and microscale mechanism of the improvement of liquefiable soil by AAS under standard curing, water curing, and seawater curing conditions are studied first. Then, the strengthening effect of the DSM technique using the soil-AAS mixture on the soil-pilesuperstructure system is studied by three-dimensional numerical analyses. The results show that the compressive strength of the soil-AAS mixture is much greater than that of the soil-cement mixture. Compressive strength of 32 MPa was obtained for a soil-ASS mixture with 25% slag content under 28-day standard curing. Moreover, the DSM technique using the soil-AAS mixture is an effective method for liquefaction mitigation; the maximum lateral displacement of the pile during shaking can be reduced by half when the area improvement ratio is 20 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据