4.8 Article

Electrochemical synthesis of Pt-decorated Au dendrite anode for constructing a direct formic acid fuel cell

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101162

关键词

Formic acid oxidation reaction; Gas diffusion electrode; Low Pt loading; Electrodeposition

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government MSIT [2021R1A2C2093358]
  2. Chung-Ang University Research Scholarship
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A2C2093358] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a facile method for the fabrication of Pt-decorated Au dendrite anodes for direct formic acid fuel cells (DFAFCs). The fabricated Pt@Au-D/CP anode exhibits high current density and maximum power density, demonstrating superior mass activity.
Scale-up fabrication of electrodes using a facile method is a challenge for the commercialization of direct formic acid fuel cells (DFAFCs). Herein, we report the facile fabrication of a Pt-decorated Au dendrite (Pt@Au-D) anode for DFAFCs. The Au dendrite was prepared by the galvanic displacement of Au on Ni-deposited carbon paper (CP) with a geometrical area of 10.2 cm2. The Pt islands were then electro-deposited on the Au dendrite with an extremely low Pt loading of 9.6 +/- 0.1 mgPt/cm2. The Pt@Au-D/CP showed a current density of 27.1 mA/cm2 at 0.5 VRHE in an electrolyte consisting of 0.5 M HCOOH thorn 0.5 M H2SO4, which was higher than those of state-of-art Pt-Au catalysts. Pt@Au-D/CP was employed as the anode for a DFAFC single cell coupled with a commercial Pt/C/CP cathode. The DFAFC single cell demonstrated a current density of 67.6 mA/cm2 at 0.4 Vcell and a maximum power density of 65.2 mW/cm2. Compared with state-of-the-art Pt-Au anodes, the Pt@Au-D/CP anode exhibited superior mass activity.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据