4.8 Article

Synthetic strategy for metallophthalocyanine covalent organic frameworks for electrochemical water oxidation

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101032

关键词

Covalent organic frameworks; Phthalocyanines; Earth abundant transition metals; Electrocatalysis; Oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sk?odowska-Curie [844313]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the SpinCat project [964972]
  3. Xunta de Galicia [ED481B 2019/091]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [844313] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a synthetic strategy for the periodic placement of catalytically active single metal atoms within a porous framework using covalent organic frameworks (COFs). The COF prepared from NiPc exhibited the best electrocatalytic performance for the oxygen evolution reaction and demonstrated excellent long-term stability during 100 hours of testing.
Atomically dispersed metal catalysts are interesting materials for electrocatalysis. To this end, covalent organic frameworks (COFs) offer an excellent opportunity for the periodic placement of catalytically active single metal atoms within a porous framework. We report here a synthetic strategy to a series of imide-linked metal-containing phthalocyanine (Pc) COFs with different metal contents. Electrocatalytic activity of the materials towards oxygen evolution reaction was studied under alkaline conditions and the COF prepared from NiPc showed the best performance with current density j = 10 mA cm-2 being reached at overpotential h10 z 410 mV and Tafel slope of b = 75 mV/dec. In addition, the material showed excellent long-term stability during the testing time of 100 h. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据