4.7 Article

Nanoporous AIMnYNiCoAu Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 17673-17681

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c03211

关键词

metallic glasses; hydrogen evolution reaction; high mixing entropy; electronic interaction; alkaline solution; nanoporous

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
  5. [2018YFA0703604]
  6. [2018YFA0703602]
  7. [NSFC 51827801]
  8. [51922102]
  9. [52071327]
  10. [92163108]
  11. [2019296]
  12. [LR22E010004]
  13. [2022C01023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective method based on hybridization strategy and de-alloying nanoporosity is reported for increasing the electrocatalytic activity of metallic glasses (MGs) in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The study found that the electrochemical performance reaches the maximum at 3% Au addition, displaying superior catalytic performance.
An effective method based on hybridization strategy and de-alloying nanoporosity is reported for increasing the electrocatalytic activity of metallic glasses (MGs) in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Based on the alloying of noble Au, the electrochemical performance reaches the maximum at 3 at. % Au addition. An overpotential as low as 124 mV at 10 mA.cm(-2) and a Tafel slope of 69 mV.dec(-1) are achieved. Such a superior catalytic performance is attributed to the large specific surface area with abundant active sites and low charge-transfer resistance. It is interesting to note that the Au3 sample has large mixing entropy, which is derived from sluggish atomic diffusion, and forms thin nanoligaments during de-alloying and thus exhibits a large specific surface area. The present work could lead to an approach to further develop environmentally friendly amorphous electrocatalysts with high efficiency and excellent stability for HER in alkaline solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据