4.7 Article

Structure and Optical Property Prediction of 2D Plasmonic Photonic Crystals Fabricated by Shadow Sphere Lithography

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 17879-17890

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c03838

关键词

2D plasmonic photonic crystals; shadow sphere lithography; Monte Carlo simulation; plasmonics; optical property

资金

  1. Basic Science Centre Project of NSFC [51788104]
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1808271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shadow sphere lithography is a powerful method for fabricating nanostructures and has potential applications in producing plasmonic photonic crystals and metamaterials. This study shows that Monte Carlo simulation is effective in predicting the structure details and plasmonic properties, providing guidance for the design of optical applications based on shadow sphere lithography.
Shadow sphere lithography (SSL) is a powerful and large-scale fabrication method to produce two-dimensional (2D) plasmonic photonic crystals and three-dimensional metamaterials. Practically, one of the biggest challenges for SSL-based fabrications is that it is hard to accurately predict the physical properties of the fabricated nanostructures if the structures were only modeled by the geometric shadowing effect. A Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is developed to show that the dynamic shadowing effect due to the accumulation of materials on the template as well as the thin-film growth mechanism plays a key role in determining the structure details. For a one-to-three step-based SSL fabrication, the nanostructures predicted by MC match very well with those produced experimentally, and the plasmonic properties predicted by these MC-simulated structures are also consistent with the features obtained experimentally, both qualitative and semi-quantitative. This study indicates a possible solution to use MC simulation and numerical calculation to guide the design of the plasmonic photonic crystals and metamaterials based on SSL for optic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据