4.7 Article

Gold Nanoparticles-Based Dual-Channel Colorimetric Array Sensors for Discrimination of Metal Ions

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 18270-18275

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c04142

关键词

metal ions; sensor array; gold nanoparticles; linear discriminant analysis; color fingerprint

资金

  1. Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province
  2. [222102310380]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report describes dual-channel colorimetric array sensors that can rapidly distinguish metal ions. By utilizing gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and two colorimetric reactions, different metal ions exhibit distinct colorimetric response modes. Additionally, the DNA absorbed on the AuNP surface can alter the catalytic ability of the AuNPs to varying degrees, resulting in different visual response modes. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is employed to analyze and classify these signal modes, enabling clear discrimination of each analyte on a LDA plot.
This report describes dual-channel colorimetric array sensors for rapid distinction of metal ions. This dual-channel sensing array is built based upon gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)-catalyzed two colorimetric reactions [3,3 ',5,5 '-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2 as channel 1 and HAuCl4 and NH2OH as channel 2]. Different metal ions show diverse interactions toward AuNPs, producing differential variations of AuNPs' catalytic ability and yielding distinct colorimetric response modes (channel 1). Different metal ions show different affinities toward the DNA absorbed on the AuNP surface, and the decrease of the amount of DNA entangled on the AuNPs changes the catalytic ability of the AuNPs to varying degrees, generating varying visual response modes (channel 2). These signal modes as fingerprints are typical for each metal ion and are analyzed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The results display clear discrimination of each analyte on a LDA plot, and 10 kinds of metal ions are well identified at a low concentration (20 nM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据